Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The real reason behind SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, etc. (It wasn't about piracy or even internet censorship)




Remember this date very well. Really, know this date well! Feb. 13, 2011, one day before Valentine's Day. Seriously, remember Feb. 13, 2011. Now, onto the program.

To this day, Lamar Smith has been an Internet Troll Target for introducing Stop Online Piracy Act, commonly known as SOPA. Basically, it was an act to have the government intervene the website whether that particular individual was violating copyright. Unfortunately, it would also mean to police the internet similiar to something called the internet blackout where anybody can abuse the law and have the government to shut them down, despite not violating any copyright laws.

Hearing about how everybody was freaking out that the government are going to intervene with their bootlegged porn collection, I have to smirk. (Mind you, it wasn't about the porn!)

Another worthnoting fact that while congress was getting involved, so are the major Hollywood players, mainly the RIAA, News Corp., Go Daddy (bailed out due to the Danica Patrick backlash), EA Games, and so on.

Of course, I was irritated about SOPA but not the reason what everything thought which was internet censorship. Yes, their points are valid that the internet should have free speech and stuff, but that wasn't the real reason why they tried to push SOPA.

And no, it wasn't about piracy, at all. Yes, many people are guilty of piracy and we should focus on buying legitimate goods (without any stupid trailers, copyright warnings, import limitations, or DLC mind you)!

So, what was the reason behing SOPA? Whenever somebody introduce the bill to congress, just remember this:

If someone or something is attempting to get influence from Washington, it probably means their current obsolete business is at stake!

That's right, the whole ordeal behind SOPA was an attempted bailout from the old Hollywood industry because they are having a hard time competing with new media (internet specifically) and they are cowarding to congress to protect their old business model. Don't believe me? Take a look at some of these cases:

Marijuana Act: Lobbied by William Randolph Hurst, The oil companies, Dupont, and the logging industry, this law was pass to prevent hemp as a commercial crop (clear violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act). To this day, industrial hemp has yet to commercialize despite clear contrast with marijuana.

Commercial Airline Bill: Lobbied by Juan Trippe of Pam Am, sponsored by Owen Wilson. It was supposed to grant a governmental monopoly to Pan Am regarding international flights due to the ongoing competition with Howard Hughes and TWA. After Hughes exposed the Pan Am / Owen Wilson conspiracy, that plan fell apart.

There are many more cases including the Betamax Case, MGM v. Grokster, Itunes, Microsoft, California Emission Mandate, among others, but it comes to no surprise they use congress to keep innovation from taking over their old business models.

Now remember I told you about Feb. 13, 2011? What to know what was that about? Well, it was the date when Arcade Fire got Album of the year at the Grammys. It wasn't Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, Eminem, or Lady Antebellum. It was an independent rock group that took home the grand prize. To celebrate their unexpected win, they performed at their face 'Ready to Start'! (I love ironies.)

Little Monsters were outraged and so were the mass audience who created a trend called 'Who's Arcade Fire?' But the real people who were outraged, even to the point of destruction, were the record producers. A Grammy win from an independent record label shows that you don't need those overpaid agents, the RIAA, or even a big label to get the awards. Though they got their big hit in their hands with Adele in 2012, the damage was already been done.

This had shown that you don't need the middlemen anymore to get your big break. Thus, if this trend continues to the Oscars, the Emmys, the Razzies (it happens), or any other award shows, along with the advertisers taking their money elsewhere, it would come to the point that Bill O'reilly would start crying to the set that his show was taken away from a non-bias Internet newsstation that advertises Chuck Norris Karate Kommandos reruns.

(Interesting enough, when Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. Saw Google TV at CES, you can see his anger and tears raging inside his head!)

It came to no surprise that Hollywood tried to use congress to keep their businesses from going under. Thus, Lamar Smith sponsored SOPA. Unfortunately, nobody expected the amount of backlash in comparison with Occupy Wall Street. In response to this whole ordeal, Google, Facebook, and Wikipedia, started to blackout content in order to show the effects on SOPA. (It also didn't help Lamar Smith that he was caught red-handed using unauthorized copyrighted work on his congressional webpage.)

Because of the overwhelming awareness on SOPA, the bill was folded and Hollywood is already banging their heads to the wall.

So remember kids, whenever a bill's introduce, don't forget that someone's business is at stake!